Open efukatsu opened 2 years ago
Dear Eitaro,
Your estimate of the genetic variance is essentially 0 for all practical purposes. All variation is attributed to residual factors.
The negative heritability is just a numerical artefact of the genetic variance near the boundary of the parameter space and possibly some assumptions that are simply not met there.
ƒacu.-
On 15/09/2022 02:59, efukatsu wrote:
Hi,
When I executed remlf90(), I obtained following results:
Variance components: Estimated variances S.E. genetic 1.844e-05 0.006452 Residual 3.721e+02 27.814000
|Estimate S.E. |
Heritability -9.729e-08 1.747e-05
Heritability should be 1.844e-05/(1.844e-05 + 3.721e+02) = 4.955657e-08
I guess the calculation of variance may be conducted using blupf90 with 16bit Half-precision floating-point format, so the variances smaller than 6.10x10^-5 may result in minus value. Is it right?
I would like to obtain advices about above results.
Thanks,
Eitaro
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/famuvie/breedR/issues/113, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLOEDUBWYX3ZAUNJ7DL56LV6JYFZANCNFSM6AAAAAAQM5HE2I. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi,
When I executed remlf90(), I obtained following results:
Variance components: Estimated variances S.E. genetic 1.844e-05 0.006452 Residual 3.721e+02 27.814000
Heritability -9.729e-08 1.747e-05
Heritability should be 1.844e-05/(1.844e-05 + 3.721e+02) = 4.955657e-08
I guess the calculation of variance may be conducted using blupf90 with 16bit Half-precision floating-point format, so the variances smaller than 6.10x10^-5 may result in minus value. Is it right?
I would like to obtain advices about above results.
Thanks,
Eitaro