Closed aonurdasdemir closed 5 years ago
Hi @aonurdasdemir
First, it's worth mentioning that the normalization is mostly for convenience in that it gives an upper bound on the objective function, making it easier to reason about.
If you want to design a mode converter from 1st -> 2nd order mode, you might have to do this a bit differently, because there is not really a straightforward way to compute the normalization.
One option would be to use the first order normalization, just as a benchmark. It might be that, due to power conservation, this ends up being the correct normalization for your problem.
Another option would be to use Simulation.flux_probe
to compute the power injected into the straight waveguide, and then use this as a normalization.
Both options should give you reasonable results.
Hope it helps!
Hi,
I see that while adding mode there is an 'order' option which specifies the mode order. But normalization is dependent to the first modes of input and output in direct wave guide. If I want to design a device which has the input in first mode and output in second mode, how should I adjust the optimization?