Closed jcharaoui closed 1 year ago
Also making a note that since the bug has been reported with RC (release-critical) severity, unless we fix it in Debian, it will be removed from the upcoming stable release (bookworm).
Yeh, I don't think we actually need UBSAN. I just thought it might be a good idea when I added in. I didn't know it could introduce security vulnerability. I am just going to remove it for now, unless Adrian suggests that I should add ASAN alongside UBSAN, rather than just remove UBSAN.
Closing as fixed.
The Debian security team believes the usage of UBSAN in HTTPDirFS may bring more harm than good:
Original bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031744