Closed rcassani closed 2 years ago
For meshabox
, I do not believe using the old tetgen (1.4.3) should cause any issue. In fact, tetgen 1.4.3 also works for brain2mesh steps, with the exception that it does not automatically label individual regions. That's the only place where tetgen1.5 is more appropriate.
what error did you see when calling meshabox?
@fangq, thanks for the quick reply. Indeed the problem was not caused by the old binary, but to the fact that binary did not have execute permissions when downloaded directly from the repo.
Not sure if the issues belongs here or in iso2mesh
In some places
brain2mesh.m
(example) callsmeshabox.m
which in turns callssurf2mesh.m
withoutmethod
thus the default'tetgen'
is used. This causes an error as the old binary is used.The error is solved by replacing the old binary,
tetgen.mexa64
, with a symbolic link totetgen1.5.mexa64