Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Issue 147 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by wesgood...@google.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 12:31
You can use the View.onWindowVisibilityChanged listener to get rid of this
problem.
@Override
protected void onStart() {
super.onStart();
if (adWhirlLayout != null) {
adWhirlLayout.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
}
}
@Override
protected void onStop() {
if (adWhirlLayout != null) {
adWhirlLayout.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
}
super.onStop();
}
Maybe it's a good practise to implement public functions in AdWhirlLayout that
trigger the listener directly.
Cheers,
Fabian
Original comment by lueghau...@gmail.com
on 9 May 2011 at 2:45
does not work!
for example I am here testing with a Nexus ONE.
onStop is only called when I intent another activity,
BUT ... when I click the LockScreen button.... onSTOP is 'NOT" called :(
Original comment by ilovesi...@gmail.com
on 22 Jul 2011 at 7:37
Shouldn't onPause be called if you lock the screen as you don't stop the
application.
I don't see why onStop should be called if the application just pauses.
Original comment by michel.racic
on 24 Jul 2011 at 2:09
*yes onPause is triggered while ScreenLock"
but still Ads are rotated in the background.
My AdWhirl Layout is defined like that within a normal Layout:
--start
adlayout = (LinearLayout) findViewById(R.id.layout_ad);
AdWhirlLayout adWhirlLayout = new AdWhirlLayout(this, AdWhirl_KEY);
RelativeLayout.LayoutParams adWhirlLayoutParams = new
RelativeLayout.LayoutParams(scaledWidth, scaledHeight);
adlayout.addView(adWhirlLayout, adWhirlLayoutParams);
adlayout.invalidate();
--end
i tried:
-- adlayout.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
does not change anything
I also made for test the adWhirlLayout global and
--- adWhirlLayout.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
even does not stop rotating.
so how to stop AdWhirl from rotating?
Original comment by ilovesi...@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2011 at 9:17
AdWhirl team - any updates on this issue? We too are facing this problem and
would like to know if you have a plan to fix it or not.
Thanks in advance.
Mayank
Original comment by apostek....@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2012 at 6:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jpin...@google.com
on 29 Oct 2010 at 6:26