Balancing of input parameters

[oliviervg1]

Currently, most functions return unrealistic data.

We need to focus on balancing the input data as soon as possible!

Current work in Balancing

[tumblerer]

Using this as a place to store ideas:

The first point of balancing is that we must achieve a drop of 5% year on year. This gives us an idea of how much energy should change year on year, which is a pretty strong change to move forward from. This directly means we can balance GDP changes.

[tumblerer]

Further to that, realistic data puts GDP spending as around 0.5%, optimistically, on Clean Energy drives. Realistically, different countries dedicate a different amount to clean energy, generally far less. However, since we can invest in industry also, this will do.

So we need to achieve a 0.5% drop per year with 0.5% of GDP.

[tumblerer]

Monitor Tax / Monitoring Price = Number of Countries monitored. Kinda. Need to find the average GDP of all countries to find the sanction rate.

[tumblerer]

Sanctioning needs to be proportionate to the risk of get caught while cheating and the cost needed to reduce carbon by the 0.5% needed

[tumblerer]

Carbon Reduction and Carbon absorption need to be a comparable cost ideally. The amount to the reduce by should be roughly equal to a proportion of the given money and the energy drop needed per round.

[tumblerer]

Some calculations: avg ALA : 15% avg DI : 72% avg Drop/y : 10685430 avg GDP : 158788 avg cash : 793.94

[tumblerer]

Avg ALA/CarbonOuput ~ 5500

[tumblerer]

2.6 tonnes of co2 per acre.

0.3846 acres per tonne.

0.0156 km^2 per tonne

http://www.treesintrust.com/environmental.shtm

[tumblerer]

For carbon Investment price.

The investment cost > the return for the next few years gained by increasing GDP.

[tumblerer]

Need to look at the cost to achieve an increase of energyOutput by a certain percentage

[tumblerer]

Going to call this done for the moment. Not going to continue working on it unless I get some feedback