Closed tumblerer closed 12 years ago
@webbo89 , @maxrev17 relevant also.
Same with mauritiaus, madagascer, guinea, grenada, barbados, belize, bhutan,
I read that very wrong the first time.
HA HA HA
On 18 June 2012 19:47, n1kunj < reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
I read that very wrong the first time.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/farhanrahman/kyoto/issues/99#issuecomment-6405302
I think I must have gotten confused with all this sorting & Excel columns etc. All other values have been corrected (with a made up Fossil Fuel % as agreed).
The new kyotoCountryData.xlsx & kyotoCountryData.csv have been pushed to my repository.
Let me know if you spot any other mistakes.
Isn't energy output supposed to be the higher one?
Yes, Stuart, you are right. I thought I'd corrected this issue last night but turns out I made yet another mistake. I re-calculated energyOutput based on carbonOutput1990 (God knows why...), not carbonOutput, so it was still wrong...
I've corrected the mistake, so energyOutput values should now (hopefully) all be correct.
Some energyOutput might not be less than carbonOutput, but exactly equal. Those are the countries that use exclusively Fossil Fuels for their Energy (i.e. where FossilFuels% == 100%) such as Bahrein.
On 19 June 2012 01:10, Stuart Holland < reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Isn't energy output supposed to be the higher one?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/farhanrahman/kyoto/issues/99#issuecomment-6412861
I've downloaded the latest xlsx and its utter nonsense at the moment. Half the countries have energyOutput > carbonOutput and the other half have energyOutput < carbonOutput.
Also, could you chage GDP to $ instead of $m.
They were in $ initially, but the constructor in AbstractCountry was in $M.
I've changed it back to $, check my repo.
On 19 June 2012 11:44, Chris < reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Also, could you chage GDP to $ instead of $m.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/farhanrahman/kyoto/issues/99#issuecomment-6421693
why change to $?
Actually, it probably doesn't make a difference when using doubles.
Mainly because the amount of carbon you need to drop is in the region of 10^7+, so you were working in fractions of availiable cash. It's really just a cosmetic thing.
This is done for the moment
Nigers energy output is higher than their carbon Output. Not possible.