Closed christophe-david closed 2 years ago
Merging #416 (ef437fc) into master (94a6adf) will increase coverage by
0.10%
. The diff coverage is90.16%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #416 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.02% 92.12% +0.10%
==========================================
Files 204 206 +2
Lines 8437 8486 +49
Branches 921 924 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 7764 7818 +54
+ Misses 502 497 -5
Partials 171 171
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/fastoad/cmd/cli.py | 84.70% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/fastoad/openmdao/variables/variable_list.py | 93.71% <80.95%> (ø) |
|
src/fastoad/openmdao/variables/variable.py | 90.24% <90.24%> (ø) |
|
src/fastoad/openmdao/problem.py | 95.76% <94.02%> (-2.52%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/fastoad/io/configuration/configuration.py | 91.10% <100.00%> (-0.50%) |
:arrow_down: |
...s/performances/mission/openmdao/mission_wrapper.py | 95.34% <100.00%> (-0.06%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/fastoad/module_management/_plugins.py | 90.78% <100.00%> (+0.12%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/fastoad/module_management/exceptions.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/fastoad/openmdao/variables/__init__.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 94a6adf...ef437fc. Read the comment docs.
This PR solves #357. It uses the idea of #374 of catching the setup failure, but uses the new capability of OpenMDAO to use
get_io_metadata()
"earlier" in setup (openmdao/openmdao#2424), making it possible to get variable information without using too much private API.Important: To use this new capability, dependency to OpenMDAO has been changed so it depends now on the master git branch. Hopefully the new OpenMDAO version will be released soon and then, the declared dependency will have to be changed.
To do more than unit testing, the mission module has been modified so it now uses dynamically shaped polars (was needed anyway). The integration test
test_non_regression_mission_only()
is now actually "mission only" (no more aerodynamics) so we get an actual problem with dynamically shaped inputs. To be noted that the CeRAS notebook also has a problem defined like that.