Personally, I'm almost exclusively looking to do online time-frequency space conversions - as such the situation is a bit different from optimising performing a whole transformation in one go on (assumed) previously-unseen data.
I think this would be good to add to the implementations against which fCWT is benchmarked - especially interesting would be how it compares in online/offline use.
Personally, I'm almost exclusively looking to do online time-frequency space conversions - as such the situation is a bit different from optimising performing a whole transformation in one go on (assumed) previously-unseen data.
I have just come across this repository by the Institute for Research and Coordination in Acoustics/Music that provides an implementation of the CWT suitable for online use (but that can also be used for offline processing). It seems that each sample is pushed back, and so the transform is updated one sample at a time.
I think this would be good to add to the implementations against which fCWT is benchmarked - especially interesting would be how it compares in online/offline use.