Closed arielj closed 3 years ago
@arielj I think that is a great idea. I'm not sure why Rubygems says that skunk is compatible with Ruby >= 0, the gemspec is pretty clear here: https://github.com/fastruby/skunk/blob/main/skunk.gemspec#L17
Any ideas why Rubygems is misreporting that information, @bronzdoc?
@etagwerker weird idk, I opened an issue https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org/issues/2651
https://rubygems.org/gems/skunk/versions/0.4.2 says Ruby >= 0
The link is for 0.4.2. ruby requirement was added in 0.5.0 https://github.com/fastruby/skunk/commit/cdfc9ff6d1649cbbf0752cb134816ec4ad02b16e
@sonalkr132 Thanks for looking into this! 🤦♂️
Closing since this is not an issue, we just need to push the latest version to rubygems that contains the ruby requirement
Describe the feature:
Problem:
The Ruby version requirement for Skunk at ruby gems is not accurate for older versions at least.
https://rubygems.org/gems/skunk/versions/0.4.2 says Ruby >= 0, but that version depends on reek 5.4.0 which depends on Ruby >= 2.3.0.
Maybe a table of which version of skunk is recommended for each version of ruby is useful.
I will abide by the code of conduct