Closed hohonuuli closed 9 months ago
@hohonuuli, are you looking for examples of how this is done (e.g., on projects in BIIGLE), proposing best practices, or noting is an issue in FathomNet to resolve? Thanks! Claude
@claudenozeres We're open to guidance on this one. This issue was created from notes from user feedback surveys.
Thanks @hohonuuli . I mentioned that because a colleague (Barbara Neves) working with underwater video imagery did a recent ICES presentation on that topic. Will ask to share. Quality control is something we wonder about--going beyond annotations with names.
@claudenozeres Yes, please share the presentation!
We track changes and allow comments now. Is this sufficient?
Do we want to capture the "confidence" from ML models?
Is a step, but I would not say it is adequate. If not clear/obvious, I could expound on this.
@claudenozeres Just a note that we're currently prioritizing based on the amount of engineering resources we have.
Provide confidence levels for annotations before and after data are uploaded to FathomNet Taxonomist should be able to assign a confidence level Person requesting change should provide explanation for suggestion Comment stream for each annotation
track confidence if user has an actual sample of the animal in the photograph.