search

fatiando / egu2021

Presentation submited to EGU2021 about Boule and Harmonica
2 stars 4 forks source link

Abstract about Boule and Harmonica for EGU 2021 (Due 20 Jan!) #1

Closed leouieda closed 3 years ago

leouieda commented 3 years ago

This is a submission for EGU 2021 to present Boule and Harmonica and solicit contributions. It's being submitted to this session. I wrote a first pass at the abstract and would welcome any feedback and corrections (feel free to open a PR).

I would like to invite as authors anyone involved in the development and conception of these two packages (not just the coding): @santisoler @dabiged @MarkWieczorek @ioshchepkov @birocoles @aguspesce @nshea3 @craigmillernz @lperozzi

If any of you would like to be listed as author, please send a pull request adding your name and affiliation to the README so I can include you in the EGU system. We have until Friday 15 of January to update the abstract.

The presentation itself will be 2 minutes (not sure if video or text this time) plus a "virtual PICO" which I think means an interactive poster.

dabiged commented 3 years ago

The abstract reads well.

This sentence in the first paragraph seems clumsy.

Much of this confusion likely stems from the lack of widely available tools for performing the more corrections needed to arrive at a geophysically meaningful gravity disturbance.

lperozzi commented 3 years ago

HI @leouieda. Many thanks for the invitation. The abstract looks very interesting. On my side, I only applied Boule and Harmonica to a dataset in order to compare a classical gravity processing (free-air corrections + 167 km approximation for topography correction) with the gravity disturbance and prism layer approach using Boule and Harmonica (preprint of the paper is available here, for those who are interested). However, I've not really participated in the development of Boule or Harmonica, so I'm not sure that I fit as an author for this abstract...

leouieda commented 3 years ago

This sentence in the first paragraph seems clumsy.

Ah that was left over from an edit. I'll more the "more" from that. Thanks for the catch!

However, I've not really participated in the development of Boule or Harmonica, so I'm not sure that I fit as an author for this abstract...

@lperozzi I invited you in particular because of the valuable feedback you gave (and are giving) on the prism layer design and other things. So I definitely think you fit as an author but that is entirely up to you 🙂

MarkWieczorek commented 3 years ago

Hi. Thanks for the invitation. I'll try to work on this tomorrow (Jan 12). There is an LPSC deadline for me that is taking all of my time.

aguspesce commented 3 years ago

Hello. Thanks for the invitation. I feel something very similar to @lperozzi. I read the abstract and I think it is very good, I really like the idea to invite other people to the project! @leouieda and @santisoler let me know if you need help with the presentation. Cheers!

-- Agustina Pesce PhD in Geophysics Postdoc scholarship @ CONICET & Instituto Geofísico Sismológico Volponi, UNSJ

leouieda commented 3 years ago

We have a bit more time now since the deadline was pushed to next week. I'll still submit this week though since the system gets really bad close to the deadline.

For session, I have two options:

  1. G1.2 Mathematical methods for the analysis of potential field data and geodetic time series: the call is for mathematical and computational advancements in gravimetry and magnetometry in various scales, for Earth and planetary applications. I think we can fit there and I expect to have a more geodetic crowd in that session, which would be good to get feedback on Boule.
  2. G4.3 Acquisition and processing of gravity and magnetic field data and their integrative interpretation: I'm co-convening this session and @santisoler is presenting there some work on equivalent sources and Harmonica. This would be more of a geophysics crowd but will already hear about Harmonica in Santiago's presentation.

Me and @santisoler were leaning towards G1.2 since that would spread related talks to other sessions and maybe draw in a different crowd. Does anyone object to that or would rather go for G4.3 instead? Please let me know before Friday since I'm planning on submitting that day.

lperozzi commented 3 years ago

Good for me the G1.2

aguspesce commented 3 years ago

My opinion is G1.2

leouieda commented 3 years ago

Alright, submitted to G1.2 🎉 We can still make changes and add authors until 20 Jan (next week).

leouieda commented 3 years ago

The abstract has been accepted and officially published! 🎉 DOI, presentation time and date, etc are in the README.