fatiando / verde

Processing and gridding spatial data, machine-learning style
https://www.fatiando.org/verde
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
603 stars 72 forks source link

Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.3 to 1.12.2 #471

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 week ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 week ago

Bumps pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.3 to 1.12.2.

Release notes

Sourced from pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish's releases.

v1.12.2

🐛 What's Fixed

The fix for signing legacy zip sdists turned out to be incomplete, so @​woodruffw💰 promptly produced another follow-up that updated pypi-attestations from v0.0.13 to v0.0.15 in #297. This is the only change since the previous release.

🪞 Full Diff: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/compare/v1.12.1...v1.12.2

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.12.1

🐛 What's Fixed

Version v1.12.0 hit several rare corner cases we never considered fully supported, and this release fixes a few of those. In #294, @​webknjaz💰 improved the self-hosted runner experience by pre-installing Python if it's not there, and with #293 the ability to use the action on GitHub Enterprise instances has been restored. The latter should've also fixed the ability to invoke pypi-publish from nested in-repo composite actions — another exotic use-case that was never tested in our CI. @​woodruffw💰 also managed to squeeze in a last-minute fix for detecting legacy .zip sdists while producing attestations via #295.

🪞 Full Diff: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/compare/v1.12.0...v1.12.1

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Huge Thanks to all the bug reporters for posting the logs, helping inspect the problems and verify the regression fixes!

v1.12.0

⚡️ Why Should You Update?

This is a minor version bump, but it does not add any new user-facing interfaces. Still, I felt like it should not be a patch-release: this update brings significant changes to the action invocation and internal release process.

Previously, each invocation of pypi-publish required building a container image in the invoking CI job. This was inefficient and added about 30 seconds to the publishing jobs at their startup just to build the container.

I wanted to improve this for over three years (#58) and a little over half a year ago @​br3ndonland💰 stepped up and offered a very comprehensive solution to the limitation I was hoping to overcome: #230.

Going forward, I'm going to pre-build per-version containers prior to cutting each release. And the action invocations will just pull the image from GitHub Container registry.

[!CAUTION] Known quirks:

  • This seems to not work on self-hosted runners without a python executable: #289. The workaround could be installing it prior to running the action.
  • Pinning to commit hashes does not work: #290. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed or switch to Git tags for now. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress. UPD: This was an issue during the first 12 hours post release and it has been addressed upstream by publishing a commit SHA-tagged image for the release on Nov 12, 2024 at 10:27 UTC+1.
  • Calling pypi-publish from another nested repo-local composite action might be breaking file paths: #291. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.
  • Running within GitHub Enterprise fails on the action repo clone: #292. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.

🪞 Full Diff: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/compare/v1.11.0...v1.12.0

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 15c56db Merge pull request #297 from trail-of-forks/ww/bump-pypi-attestations
  • fe8d148 requirements: bump pypi-attestations to 0.0.15
  • 1f5d4ec Merge pull request #295 from trail-of-forks/ww/fix-sdist-collection
  • fec2f0c attestations: collect *.zip sdists as well
  • a8b73a6 Merge pull request #294 from webknjaz/bugfixes/optional-python
  • 9b4dfb0 ✨ Pre-install Python if there's none
  • 0a87186 Merge pull request #293 from webknjaz/bugfixes/uncheckout-intermediate-action
  • dfcfeca 🧪 Use prefetched action to make trampoline
  • 0d02f37 📝💅 Update the CI/CD badge in README
  • 61da13d Merge pull request #230 from br3ndonland/ghcr
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)