remove lg

[gerritbruening]

    <f:ins n="10067" place="enclosing-lg">
      <lg rend=""/>
    </f:ins>
    <f:ins n="10073" place="enclosing-lg">
      <lg rend=""/>
    </f:ins>

It is not expressed that the resulting lg without @rend is redundant and may be dropped. Currently there is no way to express this, is there? Note that in other cases the lg are still important, because there are two of them in one speech.

[thvitt]

No, there isn’t.

[gerritbruening]

Thanks, no reason to hurry. Will keep that in mind.

[thvitt]

It’s implemented now – only in the XML format, using <f:ins place="enclosing-lg"><f:remove-lg/></f:ins>, see the schema.

[gerritbruening]

Great! Will try to use this as soon as I can.

[gerritbruening]

Have to check if this works: https://github.com/faustedition/faust-gen-html/blob/a5f4ab1689c8797b6816d0d89f6e29f968882093/text/app12norm_special-cases.xml#L309-L310

[gerritbruening]

Note that we now have

https://github.com/faustedition/faust-gen-html/blob/5722b7f2b96ebd5610b2138ee447d3810b119fc8/text/app12norm_special-cases.xml#L375-L376

which seems logical since this is the @n value, but is forbidden by the schema.

[thvitt]

The code that uses that says https://github.com/faustedition/faust-gen-html/blob/8fa8e10585e0ead7d878673ee2054a8cd9808b18/xslt/text-insert-app.xsl#L66-L67 so for <l n="3994 3995">, it will handle both <f:ins n="3994"> and <f:ins n="3995">. I wonder why I have written it that way: we probably have a use case for that?

[gerritbruening]

Have to check if this works: ...

Yes, works fine.

[thvitt]

na dann

[gerritbruening]

File is still not valid because of

https://github.com/faustedition/faust-gen-html/blob/5722b7f2b96ebd5610b2138ee447d3810b119fc8/text/app12norm_special-cases.xml#L375-L376

[thvitt]

mir ist grad nicht ganz klar, wieso es trotz dieser Codierung funktioniert, aber korrekte, unterstützte Codierung für die app*.xml wäre wie oben geschrieben <f:ins n="3994">

[thvitt]

since it works: see separate issues for the remaining issues