fccoelho
commented
9 years ago Great points,
When I sugest to give up on the supplement, I meant to drop only the stochastic model. The R_t stuff we should incorporate back in the methods section, the paper is still short. and would accommodate it well, I think.
I'll do that.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Luiz Max F. Carvalho < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Assigned #10 https://github.com/fccoelho/paperLM1/issues/10 to @fccoelho https://github.com/fccoelho.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/fccoelho/paperLM1/issues/10#event-225622893.
Flávio Codeço Coelho
+55(21) 3799-5551 Professor Escola de Matemática Aplicada Fundação Getulio Vargas Praia de Botafogo, 190 sala 312 Rio de Janeiro - RJ 22250-900 Brasil
maxbiostat
We show a couple things in that first part: (i) tail behaviour -- inverse beta approach is more conservative, and; (ii) how to include prior information on R(t) under the inverse beta sampling distribution. These may be relevant to other people . [the other day we had a talk from a guy at Imperial working on Ebola where they employed R(t) calculations and complained about how to quantify uncertainty. Turns out we have a way to, uh?]