Closed neoneye closed 4 months ago
It's better now than before. However there are no priors in the training pairs that demonstrates no-wrap-around
. IMHO it's somewhat counter intuitive that it's only the test
pair.
Idea for improvement, tweak one of the train
pairs to demonstrate that there is no wrapping around when drawing the red pixels.
This task was updated in commit: https://github.com/fchollet/ARC/commit/b7fd42c53f0c26a807ba0b00e42f858d2c11d125
Agreed. It's like this particular puzzle was created and is being maintained by an intern who is unclear on the concept of "train". No intelligent thing would assume "no local wrapping", because of example 1 and ESPECIALLY example 2. You need at least one train example that clearly shows this detail. Otherwise you might was well be shooting for a score of 99. If there is any evidence to the contrary, please present it. Without that, our only evidence is that the Test input was changed after the first issue was reported.
Thanks for the reports. I issued a fix for this task (live at HEAD). The fix is to add wraparound and add a task to demonstrate it.
Problem
ARC-Interactive
I was unable to solve this task.
My reasoning.
My predicted solution
The expected solution
Difference
My mistake was that I assumed
maintain same repeating tile
, thus assuming that the red pixels would wrap around the edge.Solution
Add a
train
pair, that demonstrates that the tiles are non-repeating.