search

fcrepo / fcrepo-specification

Fedora API Specification
Apache License 2.0
17 stars 15 forks source link

1.0.0 Recommendation Release Checklist #330

Open awoods opened 6 years ago

awoods commented 6 years ago
  1. Change title of HTML document to: Fedora API Specification 1.0.0
  2. Update HTML document status from Unofficial Draft...
  3. Release under existing date-based URL
zimeon commented 6 years ago

Hmmm... turns out that the respec tag on the top left is a background-image set via CSS, e.g. https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2016/logos/CR set in https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2016/W3C-CR

and the watermark for specStatus unofficial is a background set via CSS, https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2016/logos/UD-watermark set in https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2016/w3c-unofficial.css

zimeon commented 6 years ago

OK, it seems that respec was update with a change of bibliography handling just after my build of respec-fcrepe.js (see https://github.com/w3c/respec/commit/b847f067829a36584f8b4a6a8d3eb8be4b764f27). This does bring into question our copying of a static version separate from the "live" respec. Probably OK to stick with that for the candidate recommendation (and I'll rebuild as necessary from https://github.com/zimeon/respec) be perhaps we should relook at whether we can use the "live" respec for the final release. I'll make a PR to update...

zimeon commented 6 years ago

Also noted the recent updates to respec mean that contributors without a url attribute don't get shown. Editors agreed that we should move the list of contributors into the acknowledgements along with Sarven and Herbert. Another PR coming...

awoods commented 6 years ago

Thanks for helping wrap up this last step needed for publishing the Fedora API Specification.

We used to use the "live" version of ReSpec... but their changes unexpectedly broke our site. We therefore opted for the more stable option of referencing a local copy of the library.

If it makes sense to bring our spec up to date with the current ReSpec release, that works for me... but I would still suggest we make a local copy of it.

zimeon commented 6 years ago

Well, this is a local copy of the up-to-date version but with our changes for formatting for the CR. I suggest we go with this but think again before the final release