Closed hrayrhar closed 5 years ago
I would say this is more of a feature of GraphLasso
rather than a bug of the others, which gives him a bit more flexibility.
This parameter comes from the first of our implementations of GraphLasso
via ADMM inspired by this Matlab implementation.
Note that the over_relax
parameter is used "not to believe completely" to the prox operator in the z
-step.
However, we actually never used it, so we did not propagate its implementation on the other classes.
I guess its addition would complicate the code without any practical relevance, and the benefit of having an over-relaxation parameter on the soft-thresholding would not be enough compared to the additional effort one should use for cross-validate one more hyperparameter (which, for LatentGraphLasso
and others) is already high.
However, if you see a practical relevance of having the parameter implemented also for the LatentGraphLasso
(for start), we may discuss about implementing it for the other classes as well, and in that case I would be more than happy to accept a pull request about that if you want to contribute.
Thanks @fdtomasi for the clarification.
I have noticed the parameter
over_relax
in classesLatentGraphLasso
,LatentTimeGraphLasso
, andTimeGraphLasso
cannot be changed. It will always be 1.0 (as specified in ancestor classGraphLasso
). Is this a bug ?