Hi, I recently had to use fsarchiver for migrating Windows to an SSD for someone. I noticed all the warnings and disclaimers about NTFS support being experimental. When saving the archive I even had files with errors, so I think those warnings are justified :) I don't know if that backup will even boot, but we'll see.
To my point now. I noticed fsarchiver uses NTFS-3G as its "driver" for accessing and creating NTFS filesystems. I know NTFS-3G has many issues (mainly performance). Since Linux 5.15, a kernel driver called NTFS3 has been merged. I was wondering if using that instead of NTFS-3G could help with the speed but mainly reliability of fsarchiver on NTFS.
Hi, I recently had to use
fsarchiver
for migrating Windows to an SSD for someone. I noticed all the warnings and disclaimers about NTFS support being experimental. When saving the archive I even had files with errors, so I think those warnings are justified :) I don't know if that backup will even boot, but we'll see.To my point now. I noticed
fsarchiver
uses NTFS-3G as its "driver" for accessing and creating NTFS filesystems. I know NTFS-3G has many issues (mainly performance). Since Linux 5.15, a kernel driver called NTFS3 has been merged. I was wondering if using that instead of NTFS-3G could help with the speed but mainly reliability offsarchiver
on NTFS.