Closed solegalli closed 1 year ago
Hey @dlaprins and @ClaudioSalvatoreArcidiacono
I've got the impression that rebasing didn't work in #657 because I can see the files that we merged in #660 in there.
I tried to rebase again, but got a lot of errors, so decided to start afresh.
The changes here in summary:
Would you be able to have a quick look and if OK we merge?
Thank you!
Hi @solegalli, I'm not sure what went wrong when I rebased, but it must have done something since all unit tests except for the docstring one which failed before now passed. In any case, I reviewed this PR, no comments from my side on the code changes.
Thank you @dlaprins
I am considering now on adding an option to the variables parameter in the init, not to break backwards compatibility.
In the live version, if variables=None, the transformer will operate only on numerical variables. If we deploy this version as is, when variables=None the transformer will operate on all variables, and thus break backward compatibility.
So I am thinking of leaving variable=None with the current behaviour and adding the option variables="all" to operate on all variables.
A bit unwieldy for future use, but I suppose backwards compatibility takes precedence. I'm in favor.
closes #655 closes #658 closes #657