Closed jenniferthibault closed 7 years ago
Starting by collecting existing issues, here is a list of what we have so far:
I'll come back to pick this up & organize/group by theme (if relevant) next
Some follow-up testing can be added for this to see if users understood that they needed to go to Help for candidates and committees to access campaign guidance. After synthesis of our testing results, we might know more. The issue was logged in fec-testing and I wanted to connect it to this ticket. cc @jenniferthibault @llienfec
One way to help scope this down is to focus on known instances of incorrect navigation—times when we know something lives in one place on the site, but users are routinely trying an incorrect navigation path first—and connecting those trails.
That narrows things down to:
How might we reroute people who look for campaign guidance in "Legal resources"?
How might we guide users who seek upcoming filing deadlines to the calendar instead of the long list for now? What might a better long-term solution be?
How might we engage or redirect users who are not candidate or committee representatives, but would find information in that section useful?
The same might be asked of Legal resources—- How might we engage or redirect users who are not lawyers or legal researchers, but would find information in that section useful?
This might seem like a lot, but I'm imagining this issue is not to completely solve all the problems, but rather to identify a system of improvements we could make, and determine what would be the achievable in the near term.
Since I'll be OOO for the rest of the week, I'll move this issue out of "In progress" to keep stand ups moving fluidly, but thoughts are welcome from anyone who wants to lend their brain! cc folks who expressed interest in the issue: @dorothyyeager @jameshupp @rhoughfec @patphongs @llienfec
I've put together a system of changes based on a few design themes that I'm pretty excited about. These changes should give us some flexibility that we've been lacking on landing pages, especially, and I'm really excited to see what you all think and how we might make them even better.
Make Campaign guidance for candidates and committees
its own landing page
Most importantly, this allows the Help for candidates and committees
page to start meeting other users needs, for both committees and observers. It also lets us flesh out the campaign guidance section with publications and offerings just for committees, like trainings, FEC record publications, and tips for treasurers.
Advanced data
template. This would be just a first step, I'm sure we could improve this further to try and focus on reducing the number of clicks.Restyle landing pages as collections with hierarchy based on usefulness, rather than index-like lists where everything is presented equally
As we've been designing the site, we've consciously been needing to put pages and information up before we fully understand how or how much people use it. This means that a lot of the landing pages are built as index pages. We've gained better understanding of the information users prioritize, and have started to successfully redesign them, like the data landing page. I think we're at the point with Help for candidates and committees
and Legal resources
that we can start making those same sorts of informed decisions.
Help for candidates and committees
could look like with the features we have now, and cross-linking to other sections relevant to users who come here (this also partially ties in https://github.com/18F/openFEC-web-app/issues/2132 , about efiling )Legal resources
landing page could look like that would prioritize information people seek, and could help redirect users who go looking there for campaign guidance.I've updated the designs based on great feedback in last week's design pairing, including:
The independent guide pages would bee the same as outlined above in https://github.com/18F/openFEC-web-app/issues/2185#issuecomment-324472620
(for comparison, here is another version that was left on the cutting room floor that reduces the competition between the popular topics and the guides, but feels less visually restful)
Would love if @llienfec @rhoughfec @noahmanger @jameshupp @patphongs could take a look to see if this feels like an improvement based on what we discussed last week, and if I have the right examples in place, especially in the "You might also like" sections
After a great design pairing today we made some further refinements, and have the set that's ready for demoing with the rest of the team in order to move toward implementation and testing:
To make more room on the Help for candidates and committees landing page for giving an overview to the section and most-sought information
I've started placeholder implementation issues in #2286, #2287, and #2288 for each of the above, which we can groom into readiness once we get 👍 from our broader team/product owners
This looks completely awesome to me! Thank you for all of the time, thought and care. I think we're ready to move forward with these issues.
Closing in favor of #2286 , #2287 , and #2288 which will implement these. Once implemented, testing should happen on staging/dev before the concepts are moved to production.
Criteria for completion
Although they certainly relate, so that we could take them on in stages, we separated the home page changes from the bigger, more cross-page issue of navigating around the site. It's expected that the work in #2159 may need to adjust based on this work.