The first RESTful API for the Federal Election Commission. We're aiming to make campaign finance more accessible for journalists, academics, developers, and other transparency seekers.
Our is_individual function does not correctly identify partnership lump-sums reported without partnership memo items as individual contributions.
Expected Behavior
We should correctly identify all individual contributions.
Actual Behavior
For example, only 2 of 16 contributions from this entity, American Ethane Company LLC, are correctly identified as individual contributions. All 16 contributions are individual contributions.
Compare results from individual contributors search https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_name=American+Ethane&two_year_transaction_period=2018 and all receipts search https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?data_type=processed&contributor_name=American+Ethane&two_year_transaction_period=2018
select is_individual, cmte_id, contbr_nm, contb_receipt_amt, contb_receipt_dt::timestamp::date, receipt_tp, receipt_desc, image_num, filing_form, line_num
from disclosure.fec_fitem_sched_a
where rpt_yr in (2017, 2018)
and cmte_id in ('C00543983', 'C00568162', 'C00558486', 'C00608398', 'C00632679', 'C00634774', 'C00608695')
and contbr_nm like '%AMERICAN ETHANE%';
is_individual
cmte_id
contbr_nm
contb_receipt_amt
contb_receipt_dt
receipt_tp
receipt_desc
image_num
filing_form
line_num
TRUE
C00632679
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
15000
4/16/2018
10
201807139115433865
F3X
11AI
TRUE
C00543983
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
-600
3/31/2018
201804200200346244
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00543983
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
1000
3/31/2018
201804200200346244
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00543983
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
600
3/31/2018
201804200200346245
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608695
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
2700
4/25/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807109115289534
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00634774
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
5000
4/30/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807139115402370
F3X
11AI
FALSE
C00608398
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
2700
4/30/2018
201807180200573399
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608398
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
2700
4/30/2018
201807180200573398
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608398
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY , LLC
2700
4/30/2018
201807180200573400
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608695
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
700
4/25/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807099115254765
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608695
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
700
4/25/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807109115289534
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608695
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
2700
4/25/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807099115254765
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608695
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
2700
4/25/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807099115254765
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00608695
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY, LLC
2700
4/25/2018
PARTNERSHIP
201807109115289534
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00558486
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
5400
5/10/2018
REFUNDED ON 6/1
201808309121545905
F3
11AI
FALSE
C00568162
AMERICAN ETHANE COMPANY LLC
10000
7/19/2018
CONTRIBUTION
201810159124938824
F3X
11AI
Current coding procedures do not categorize the partnership contribution even when there are no partner memo items. Our is_individual function looks for transaction types 10, 15, 15E, 15J, 30, 30T, 31, 31T, 32, 10J, 11, 11J, 30J, 31J, 32T and 32J. In addition it looks for transactions less than $200 with null memo code on Forms 3 and 3X Lines 11AI and 12 and Form 3P Lines 17, 17A and 18.
One suggestion is looking for LLC or partnership in the contributor name. This strategy would capture both partnership lump-sums reported with partnership memo items and partnership lump-sums reported without partnership memo items. I'm pretty sure this approach would inflate our individual contributions aggregations (by state and by size).
is_individual function:
IF
(
-- is_coded_individual(TRANSACTION_TP)
coalesce(TRANSACTION_TP, ' ') in ('10', '15', '15E', '15J', '30', '30T', '31', '31T', '32', '10J', '11', '11J', '30J', '31J', '32T', '32J')
OR
-- is_inferred_individual(TRANSACTION_AMT, LINE_NUM, MEMO_CD, MEMO_TEXT, OTHER_ID, CMTE_ID)
(
TRANSACTION_AMT < 200
and coalesce(LINE_NUM, ' ') in ('11AI', '12', '17', '17A', '18')
and MEMO_CD is NULL
)
) THEN
v_IS_IND := 1;
END IF;
To do
[ ] Make sure we're not doublecounting contributions from partnerships that are also attributed to individuals via memo entries (or similar type transactions).
[ ] Fix logic in both Oracle and Post Gres
[ ] Recalculate aggregates
[ ] Repopulate All Schedules A (time consuming!)
[ ] Consider if we need to split this into other tickets.
Summary
Our
is_individual
function does not correctly identify partnership lump-sums reported without partnership memo items as individual contributions.Expected Behavior
We should correctly identify all individual contributions.
Actual Behavior
For example, only 2 of 16 contributions from this entity, American Ethane Company LLC, are correctly identified as individual contributions. All 16 contributions are individual contributions.
Compare results from individual contributors search
https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_name=American+Ethane&two_year_transaction_period=2018
and all receipts searchhttps://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?data_type=processed&contributor_name=American+Ethane&two_year_transaction_period=2018
Current coding procedures do not categorize the partnership contribution even when there are no partner memo items. Our
is_individual
function looks for transaction types10
,15
,15E
,15J
,30
,30T
,31
,31T
,32
,10J
,11
,11J
,30J
,31J
,32T
and32J
. In addition it looks for transactions less than $200 with null memo code on Forms 3 and 3X Lines11AI
and12
and Form 3P Lines17
,17A
and18
.One suggestion is looking for
LLC
orpartnership
in the contributor name. This strategy would capture both partnership lump-sums reported with partnership memo items and partnership lump-sums reported without partnership memo items. I'm pretty sure this approach would inflate our individual contributions aggregations (by state and by size).is_individua
l function:To do