Closed cnlucas closed 6 days ago
Currently a search for "52 USC" (no internal periods) will return 76 results and exclude results for "52 U.S.C.," and "52 U.S.C." (internal periods) will return 1255 results and appears to exclude "52 USC"
Because citations and names have periods (102.2, commissioner names..) I think this behavior should not be changed. Stripping the periods on the FE or ignoring them on the backend would ultimately limit our users ability to search by specific parts and sections. We would have to create a custom analyzer to fix this on the back end.
We are holding off on this for now, but may consider a custom analyzer later.
What we’re after
Our users want their queries to ignore periods, but standard analyzer ignores all punctuation except for periods. We should look into normalizing periods ideally without having to switch to a custom analyzer.
(This is not as important as other issues, but is nice to have)
Action items:
Completion criteria