While trying to use the Document class in the DigitalTwin ontology, we have realised that it is a subclass of PhysicalObject. While this may be valid in cases where we want to represent a physical document (e.g., a CMR printed on paper), most probably this is not the most typical use case, and we would really like to refer to a digital document (e.g., as described in schema.org/DigitalDocument).
Would it make sense to create a new concept DigitalDocument as a subclass of a new concept DigitalObject in this ontology, and rename the current Document to PhysicalDocument if we want to keep it?
While trying to use the Document class in the DigitalTwin ontology, we have realised that it is a subclass of PhysicalObject. While this may be valid in cases where we want to represent a physical document (e.g., a CMR printed on paper), most probably this is not the most typical use case, and we would really like to refer to a digital document (e.g., as described in schema.org/DigitalDocument).
Would it make sense to create a new concept DigitalDocument as a subclass of a new concept DigitalObject in this ontology, and rename the current Document to PhysicalDocument if we want to keep it?