Closed jernst closed 15 hours ago
In the current test results, I see:
{
"plan_test_index": 2,
"started": "2024-06-06T12:54:23.080073Z",
"ended": "2024-06-06T12:54:23.189560Z",
"result": {
"type": "HardAssertionFailure",
"problem_category": "hard",
"stacktrace": [
...
[
"tests/webfinger/server/4_2__2_perform_query.py",
19
],
...
],
"msg": "Link type not a valid media type: \"template\"\nAccessed URI: \"https://realize.be/.well-known/webfinger?resource=acct%3Aswentel%40realize.be\".\nExpected: None\n but: was <Link type not a valid media type: \"template\">\n"
},
"run_steps": null
},
This is the one I suggested should be a soft fail.
I misunderstood? We have a test that fails ... it's just that you think it should be downgraded?
If you feel strongly about it, let's do that, but it seems from the discussion that they really didn't mean it and really should fix it, there is no good reason for it. We don't really want others to start implementing the same pattern because it is sort of okay ...
I'm not suggesting an endorsement of the pattern (it would still be a failure), but that it doesn't represent an interop risk (which I'm currently interpreting as "soft failure").
Per discussion in #105.