sendMessage currently supports testingFarmResult, but some pipelines might not use testing farm, it would be nice if the function could support passing an xunit file as parameter.
This is a really good idea. I don't remember why I went with the full testing farm response map, but having just xunit passed as a param seems to be sufficient for the sendMessage purposes.
sendMessage currently supports testingFarmResult, but some pipelines might not use testing farm, it would be nice if the function could support passing an xunit file as parameter.