Closed tyll closed 8 years ago
This is an untested attempt to get rid of the gpg_id as discussed in #53 . A validator for the GPG fingerprint is still missing here, also I do not know if it looks good. Feedback welcome! :-)
Eh, we have merge conflicts now. @tyll can you rebase?
it is rebased now
@pypingou, @laxathom - this looks good to me. Anyone else want to give it a look before we merge?
I will.
This is an untested attempt to get rid of the gpg_id as discussed in #53 . A validator for the GPG fingerprint is still missing here, also I do not know if it looks good. Feedback welcome! :-)