Closed sanjayankur31 closed 5 years ago
So the problem is that there is no info for these packages in mdapi for the f29 branch for example https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/f29/srcpkg/python-efel
And these packages don't seems to be in f29, I am not sure why the packages does not look at the packages in rawhide, i ll check that and add another comment here.
Uhm, these packages are in F28/F29 also:
So mdapi has no info for stable branches: back to mdapi bug then?
Uhm, these packages are in F28/F29 also:
* https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-efel/branches?branchname=master * https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=python-efel
So mdapi has no info for stable branches: back to mdapi bug then?
I ll investigate the mdapi side before we decide to open a ticket other there :smile:
So I have opened https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1105, let see how that goes :smile:
@cverna I see the pagure ticket was closed. Is this a simple fix (I hope!)?
@sanjayankur31 we are currently waiting on the next update compose run to happen, that should create the files needed by mdapi. Then I can reindex packages and we should have the info available
@cverna did the indexing thing work? These packages are still missing :(
@sanjayankur31 sorry for not updating the ticket but https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/f29/srcpkg/python-efel is still giving a 404. I need to look deeper at mdapi code and I have not had time to do that today.
Sure, no worries. Thanks again :)
Hi! I was told on https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7974#comment-581356 that I should note here that one of the packages I maintain, igt-gpu-tools, doesn't seem to have any information on the packages application either
So all these packages are now working. Closing this ticket.
This seems broken again. All the packages I'm looking at today have no mdapi data, and I'm pretty sure they used to.
Same here, e.g. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/scummvm can't be found. Please re-open the bug report.
From https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7471
Sorry for opening this again (it was supposed to be fixed in #7291), but lots of our packages are still missing information on the packages application. Examples:
nirik said mdapi does have the info, but the packages app isn't picking it up: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7471#comment-548244
Could someone have a look please?