fedora-llvm-team / llvm-snapshots

Everything to build LLVM snapshots
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/fedora-llvm-team/llvm-snapshots/
14 stars 8 forks source link

Snapshot for 20240605, v19.0.0, e5f7123 (big-merge) #537

Closed github-actions[bot] closed 3 weeks ago

github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Hello @kwk!

This issue exists to let you know that we are about to monitor the builds of the LLVM (v19.0.0, llvm/llvm-project@ e5f7123) snapshot for 20240605.

At certain intervals the CI system will update this very comment over time to reflect the progress of builds.
Log analysis
For example if a build of the llvm project fails on the fedora-rawhide-x86_64 platform, we'll analyze the build log (if any) to identify the cause of the failure. The cause can be any of ['srpm_build_issue', 'copr_timeout', 'network_issue', 'dependency_issue', 'test', 'downstream_patch_application', 'rpm__installed_but_unpackaged_files_found', 'rpm__directory_not_found', 'rpm__file_not_found', 'cmake_error', 'unknown']. For each cause we will list the packages and the relevant log excerpts.
Use of labels
Let's assume a unit test test in upstream LLVM was broken. We will then add these labels to this issue: error/test, build_failed_on/fedora-rawhide-x86_64, project/llvm. If you manually restart a build in Copr and can bring it to a successful state, we will automatically remove the aforementioned labels.

Last updated: 2024-06-07T23:21:00.943170

Build Matrix | |llvm| |:---|:---:| |fedora-39-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531609)| |fedora-39-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531610)| |fedora-39-ppc64le
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531611)| |fedora-39-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531612)| |fedora-39-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531857)| |fedora-40-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531614)| |fedora-40-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531615)| |fedora-40-ppc64le
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531616)| |fedora-40-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531617)| |fedora-40-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531618)| |fedora-rawhide-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531619)| |fedora-rawhide-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531620)| |fedora-rawhide-ppc64le
:warning: pipeline error|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531621)| |fedora-rawhide-s390x
:warning: pipeline error|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531622)| |fedora-rawhide-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531623)| |rhel-9-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531624)| |rhel-9-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531625)| |rhel-9-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7531626)|
Build status legend
  • :o: : canceled
  • :x: : failed
  • :ballot_box_with_check: : forked
  • :inbox_tray: : importing
  • :soon: : pending
  • :running: : running
  • :no_entry_sign: : skipped
  • :star: : starting
  • :white_check_mark: : succeeded
  • :hourglass: : waiting
  • :grey_question: : unknown
  • :warning: : pipeline error (only relevant to testing-farm)
kwk commented 3 weeks ago

/retest rhel-9-s390x

nikic commented 3 weeks ago

/retest rhel-9-s390x