fedora-llvm-team / llvm-snapshots

Everything to build LLVM snapshots
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/fedora-llvm-team/llvm-snapshots/
14 stars 8 forks source link

Snapshot for 20240618, v19.0.0, bea329e (big-merge) #553

Closed github-actions[bot] closed 3 hours ago

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Hello @kwk!

This issue exists to let you know that we are about to monitor the builds of the LLVM (v19.0.0, llvm/llvm-project@ bea329e) snapshot for 20240618.

At certain intervals the CI system will update this very comment over time to reflect the progress of builds.
Log analysis
For example if a build of the llvm project fails on the fedora-rawhide-x86_64 platform, we'll analyze the build log (if any) to identify the cause of the failure. The cause can be any of ['srpm_build_issue', 'copr_timeout', 'network_issue', 'dependency_issue', 'test', 'downstream_patch_application', 'rpm__installed_but_unpackaged_files_found', 'rpm__directory_not_found', 'rpm__file_not_found', 'cmake_error', 'unknown']. For each cause we will list the packages and the relevant log excerpts.
Use of labels
Let's assume a unit test test in upstream LLVM was broken. We will then add these labels to this issue: error/test, build_failed_on/fedora-rawhide-x86_64, project/llvm. If you manually restart a build in Copr and can bring it to a successful state, we will automatically remove the aforementioned labels.

Last updated: 2024-06-20T23:21:12.857426

Build Matrix | |llvm| |:---|:---:| |fedora-39-aarch64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622603)| |fedora-39-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622604)| |fedora-39-ppc64le|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622605)| |fedora-39-s390x|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622606)| |fedora-39-x86_64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622607)| |fedora-40-aarch64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622608)| |fedora-40-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622609)| |fedora-40-ppc64le|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622610)| |fedora-40-s390x|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622611)| |fedora-40-x86_64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622612)| |fedora-rawhide-aarch64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622613)| |fedora-rawhide-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622614)| |fedora-rawhide-ppc64le|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622615)| |fedora-rawhide-s390x|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622616)| |fedora-rawhide-x86_64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622617)| |rhel-9-aarch64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622618)| |rhel-9-s390x|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622619)| |rhel-9-x86_64|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7622620)|
Build status legend
  • :o: : canceled
  • :x: : failed
  • :ballot_box_with_check: : forked
  • :inbox_tray: : importing
  • :soon: : pending
  • :running: : running
  • :no_entry_sign: : skipped
  • :star: : starting
  • :white_check_mark: : succeeded
  • :hourglass: : waiting
  • :grey_question: : unknown
  • :warning: : pipeline error (only relevant to testing-farm)
github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Testing-farm results are in!

Last updated: 2024-06-20T22:18:55.942139

Some (if not all) results from testing-farm are in. This comment will be updated over time and is detached from the main issue comment because we want to preserve the logs entirely and not shorten them.

[!NOTE] Please be aware that the testing-farm artifact links a valid for no longer than 90 days. That is why we persists the log outputs here.

[!WARNING] This list is not extensive if tests have been run in the Red Hat internal testing-farm ranch and failed. For those, take a look in the "chroot" column of the build matrix above and look for failed tests that show a :lock: symbol.

Failed testing-farm test cases

/llvm-tests/tests/integration-test-suite on fedora-rawhide-aarch64 (see testing-farm artifacts) ``` + threads=0 + thread_args= + repo_url=https://github.com/opencollab/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite + '[' 0 -gt 0 ']' + '[' 0 -ge 1 ']' ++ mktemp -d -p /var/tmp + cd /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom + git clone https://github.com/opencollab/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite Cloning into 'llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite'... + cd llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite + mkdir _build + cd _build + cmake .. -DENABLE_LIBCXX=OFF -DENABLE_STATIC_LIBCXX=OFF -DENABLE_LIBUNWIND=OFF CMake Deprecation Warning at CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required): Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 will be removed from a future version of CMake. Update the VERSION argument value or use a ... suffix to tell CMake that the project does not need compatibility with older versions. [... CMAKE CONFIGURE LOG SHORTENED ...] + lit --show-unsupported --show-xfail -v tests PASS: LLVM regression suite :: atomic_fetch.c (1 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: basic_clang_tidy.cpp (2 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: basic_lib++.cpp (3 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: basic_lib++2.cpp (4 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: basic_lldb.c (5 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: basic_lldb2.cpp (6 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: basic_debuginfo.c (7 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: basic_openmp.c (8 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: clang_format.c (9 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: code_coverage.cpp (10 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: buildid.c (11 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: code_profiling.cpp (12 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: format_diff.c (13 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: from_chars_libc++.cpp (14 of 51) FAIL: LLVM regression suite :: gold.c (15 of 51) ******************** TEST 'LLVM regression suite :: gold.c' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- RUN: at line 3: /usr/bin/clang -fuse-ld=gold /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/tests/gold.c -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/gold.c.tmp + /usr/bin/clang -fuse-ld=gold /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/tests/gold.c -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/gold.c.tmp clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=gold' -- ******************** UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: hello.mlir (16 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: include_limits.c (17 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: libc++_link_static.cpp (18 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: libc++_static_shared.cpp (19 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: from_chars.cpp (20 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: llvm-ir.c (21 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: libclang_cpp.cpp (22 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: lto_and_cfi.c (23 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: llvm_config_libs.cpp (24 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: lto_and_cross_dso_cfi.c (25 of 51) FAIL: LLVM regression suite :: lto_and_gold.c (26 of 51) ******************** TEST 'LLVM regression suite :: lto_and_gold.c' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- RUN: at line 3: /usr/bin/clang -c -flto /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/tests/lto_and_gold.c -DLIB -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-obj.o + /usr/bin/clang -c -flto /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/tests/lto_and_gold.c -DLIB -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-obj.o RUN: at line 4: /usr/bin/clang -c -flto /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/tests/lto_and_gold.c -ULIB -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-main.o + /usr/bin/clang -c -flto /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/tests/lto_and_gold.c -ULIB -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-main.o RUN: at line 5: /usr/bin/clang -fuse-ld=gold -flto /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-obj.o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-main.o -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp + /usr/bin/clang -fuse-ld=gold -flto /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-obj.o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp-main.o -o /var/tmp/tmp.zShBBCXRom/llvm-toolchain-integration-test-suite/_build/tests/Output/lto_and_gold.c.tmp clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=gold' clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=gold' -- ******************** PASS: LLVM regression suite :: lto_and_lld.c (27 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: minimal_mlir_cmake.txt (28 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: openmp_headers.c (29 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: openmp_tools.c (30 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: partial-toolchain.cpp (31 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: minimal_llvm_cmake.txt (32 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: plugins.cpp (33 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: rpass_inline.cpp (34 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: save-optimization-record.c (35 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: scanbuild_missing_delete.cpp (36 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: scanbuild_py.cpp (37 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: scanbuild_py_makefile.txt (38 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_asan_heap.c (39 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_asan_lc.c (40 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_clangd.txt (41 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_hwasan.c (42 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_leaksan.c (43 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: plugins_newpm.txt (44 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_ubsan.c (45 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: test_tsan.c (46 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: unwind.cpp (47 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: thinlto.c (48 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: warning_conversion.c (49 of 51) UNSUPPORTED: LLVM regression suite :: whole-toolchain.cpp (50 of 51) PASS: LLVM regression suite :: whole-toolchain.c (51 of 51) ******************** Unsupported Tests (12): LLVM regression suite :: basic_lib++.cpp LLVM regression suite :: basic_lib++2.cpp LLVM regression suite :: basic_lldb.c LLVM regression suite :: basic_lldb2.cpp LLVM regression suite :: from_chars_libc++.cpp LLVM regression suite :: hello.mlir LLVM regression suite :: libc++_link_static.cpp LLVM regression suite :: libc++_static_shared.cpp LLVM regression suite :: minimal_mlir_cmake.txt LLVM regression suite :: partial-toolchain.cpp LLVM regression suite :: unwind.cpp LLVM regression suite :: whole-toolchain.cpp ******************** Failed Tests (2): LLVM regression suite :: gold.c LLVM regression suite :: lto_and_gold.c Testing Time: 13.02s Total Discovered Tests: 51 Unsupported: 12 (23.53%) Passed : 37 (72.55%) Failed : 2 (3.92%) Shared connection to 18.224.138.237 closed. ```
nikic commented 1 week ago

/retest fedora-rawhide-x86_64

tuliom commented 3 hours ago

These test failures are not happening anymore.