Snapshot for 20240917, v20.0.0, 49c5ceb (big-merge)

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue exists to let you know that we are about to monitor the builds of the LLVM (v20.0.0, llvm/llvm-project@ 49c5ceb) snapshot for 20240917.

At certain intervals the CI system will update this very comment over time to reflect the progress of builds.

Log analysis

For example if a build of the llvm project fails on the fedora-rawhide-x86_64 platform, we'll analyze the build log (if any) to identify the cause of the failure. The cause can be any of ['srpm_build_issue', 'copr_timeout', 'network_issue', 'dependency_issue', 'test', 'downstream_patch_application', 'rpm__installed_but_unpackaged_files_found', 'rpm__directory_not_found', 'rpm__file_not_found', 'cmake_error', 'unknown']. For each cause we will list the packages and the relevant log excerpts.

Use of labels

Let's assume a unit test test in upstream LLVM was broken. We will then add these labels to this issue: error/test, build_failed_on/fedora-rawhide-x86_64, project/llvm. If you manually restart a build in Copr and can bring it to a successful state, we will automatically remove the aforementioned labels.

Last updated: 2024-09-19T23:22:39.833914

Build Matrix

| |llvm| |:---|:---:| |fedora-39-aarch64
:x: tests failed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025793)| |fedora-39-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025795)| |fedora-39-ppc64le
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025797)| |fedora-39-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025799)| |fedora-39-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025801)| |fedora-40-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025803)| |fedora-40-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025805)| |fedora-40-ppc64le
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025807)| |fedora-40-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025809)| |fedora-40-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025811)| |fedora-41-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025813)| |fedora-41-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025815)| |fedora-41-ppc64le
:warning: pipeline error|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025817)| |fedora-41-s390x
:warning: pipeline error|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025819)| |fedora-41-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025821)| |fedora-rawhide-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025823)| |fedora-rawhide-i386|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025825)| |fedora-rawhide-ppc64le
:warning: pipeline error|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025827)| |fedora-rawhide-s390x
:warning: pipeline error|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025828)| |fedora-rawhide-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed|[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025829)| |rhel-8-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025830)| |rhel-8-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025831)| |rhel-8-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025832)| |rhel-9-aarch64
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025833)| |rhel-9-s390x
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025834)| |rhel-9-x86_64
:white_check_mark: tests passed :lock: |[:white_check_mark:](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8025835)|

Build status legend

• :o: : canceled
• :x: : failed
• :ballot_box_with_check: : forked
• :inbox_tray: : importing
• :soon: : pending
• :running: : running
• :no_entry_sign: : skipped
• :star: : starting
• :white_check_mark: : succeeded
• :hourglass: : waiting
• :grey_question: : unknown
• :warning: : pipeline error (only relevant to testing-farm)

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-39-aarch64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-39-i386 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-39-ppc64le chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-39-s390x chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-39-x86_64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-40-aarch64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-40-i386 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-40-ppc64le chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-40-s390x chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-40-x86_64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-41-aarch64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-41-i386 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-41-ppc64le chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-41-s390x chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-41-x86_64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-rawhide-aarch64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-rawhide-i386 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-rawhide-ppc64le chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-rawhide-s390x chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the fedora-rawhide-x86_64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the rhel-8-aarch64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the rhel-8-s390x chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the rhel-8-x86_64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the rhel-9-aarch64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the rhel-9-s390x chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is a placeholder for any errors that might happen for the rhel-9-x86_64 chroot.

[github-actions[bot]]

Testing-farm results are in!

Last updated: 2024-09-19T23:22:38.693990

Some (if not all) results from testing-farm are in. This comment will be updated over time and is detached from the main issue comment because we want to preserve the logs entirely and not shorten them.

[!NOTE] Please be aware that the testing-farm artifact links a valid for no longer than 90 days. That is why we persists the log outputs here.

[!WARNING] This list is not extensive if tests have been run in the Red Hat internal testing-farm ranch and failed. For those, take a look in the "chroot" column of the build matrix above and look for failed tests that show a :lock: symbol.

Failed testing-farm test cases

/clang-tests/tests/llvm-test-suite on fedora-39-aarch64 (see testing-farm artifacts)

``` + git clone --depth 1 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm-test-suite.git llvm-test-suite Cloning into 'llvm-test-suite'... + cd llvm-test-suite/tests/test-suite + ./runtest.sh ++ mktemp -d + cd /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi + cmake -G Ninja /usr/share/llvm-test-suite/ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DTEST_SUITE_LIT_FLAGS=-sv [... CMAKE CONFIGURE LOG SHORTENED ...] + ninja check [... CMAKE BUILD LOG SHORTENED ...] /usr/bin/ld: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/bison/CMakeFiles/mybison.dir/files.c.o: in function `openfiles': files.c:(.text+0x474): warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' or `mkdtemp' /usr/bin/ld: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/CMakeFiles/unix-smail.dir/deliver.c.o: in function `deliver': deliver.c:(.text+0x160): warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' or `mkdtemp' /usr/bin/ld: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeFiles/office-ispell.dir/ispell.c.o: in function `main': ispell.c:(.text+0xc18): warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' or `mkdtemp' /usr/bin/ld: SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-fprintf-2.dir/fprintf-2.c.o: in function `main': fprintf-2.c:(.text+0x14): warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' /usr/bin/ld: SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-printf-2.dir/printf-2.c.o: in function `main': printf-2.c:(.text+0x8c): warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' /usr/bin/ld: SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-user-printf.dir/user-printf.c.o: in function `main': user-printf.c:(.text+0x98): warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40 FAIL: test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test (1440 of 3380) ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test' FAILED ******************** /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/tools/timeit-target --limit-core 0 --limit-cpu 7200 --timeout 7200 --limit-file-size 104857600 --limit-rss-size 838860800 --append-exitstatus --redirect-output /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/Output/miniFE.test.out --redirect-input /dev/null --chdir /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE --summary /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/Output/miniFE.test.time /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE -nx 64 -ny 64 -nz 64 /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/tools/fpcmp-target /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/Output/miniFE.test.out /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.reference_output + /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/tools/fpcmp-target /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/Output/miniFE.test.out /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.reference_output /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/tools/fpcmp-target: Comparison failed, textual difference between '0' and '7' ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. ******************** Failed Tests (1): test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test Testing Time: 672.79s Total Discovered Tests: 3380 Passed: 3379 (99.97%) Failed: 1 (0.03%) FAILED: CMakeFiles/check /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi/CMakeFiles/check cd /tmp/tmp.nxzmyH7hvi && /usr/bin/lit -sv . ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. Shared connection to 3.133.97.36 closed. ```

[nikic]

Another spurious failure in miniFE. We should get better debug output for future failures though, and will hopefully be able to tell what is going on there...