Closed hroncok closed 7 years ago
I would prefer to not name it simply ethtool, to avoid potential conflicts. py-ethool or ethtool-py might server our case better? Although I don't really like these names. Any other ideas?
This is what I'm proposing:
Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface
python-ethtool
allows querying...
python-ethtool
also provides...
python-ethtool
is free software ...
Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface
The Python ethtool
module allows querying...
ethtool
also provides...
The Python ethtool
module is free software...
What about pethtool
? That is how the ethtool
utility clone is called as well.
I don't want to rename this. The module name is ethtool
and changing it would not help anything.
Bumping this.
I wrote some discussion on the topic of module and project naming, but then I realized my only issue with your suggestion is probably the missing article in your sentences.
If Python is being used as an adjective in those sentences, I believe what we should write is:
The Python
ethtool
module allows querying...ethtool
also provides... The Pythonethtool
module is free software ...
I'd be fine with this.
@Sanqui agreed. will edit.
After giving it some thought I'd say we move forward and change how the module is referenced in the readme according to @hroncok 's suggestions.
The name
python-ethtool
is kind of a name of an RPM package rather than a Python package/project. Although the repo namepython-ethtool
might be fine to distinguish between this and the real ethtool, I would reference to the tool asPython ethtool
in the README. Note that both the module and the package are already called justethtool
. Thoughts?