search

fedora-silverblue / issue-tracker

Fedora Silverblue issue tracker
https://fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/silverblue/
126 stars 3 forks source link

New Package Request: foot-terminfo for Sway Spin of Fedora Silverblue #421

Closed davidthewatson closed 1 year ago

davidthewatson commented 1 year ago

  1. Is the package installed by default in Fedora Workstation? If it is not, we will ask you to open an issue in the issue tracker for the Fedora Workstation Working Group.

    Yes, I believe so. I'm running the rawhide build of Fedora Silverblue with Sway. Since this is functionally identical to the Sway version of Workstation, I believe that makes it a requirement for foot to work reliably for things that depend on foot-terminfo. Foot is the default terminal on sway.

  2. What, if any, are the additional dependencies on the package? What is the output of this command on a system without overrides or locally installed packages:

    ncurses-base-6.4-3.20230114.fc38 in Fedora Rawhide

  3. What is the size of the package and its dependencies?

    [watson@fedora ~]$ bash
[watson@fedora ~]$ rpm -qi foot-terminfo
Name        : foot-terminfo
Version     : 1.13.1
Release     : 2.fc38
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Mon 20 Feb 2023 12:42:14 AM EST
Group       : Unspecified
Size        : 8252
License     : MIT
Signature   : RSA/SHA256, Wed 01 Feb 2023 08:30:02 PM EST, Key ID 75cf5ac418b8e74c
Source RPM  : foot-1.13.1-2.fc38.src.rpm
Build Date  : Wed 18 Jan 2023 10:56:46 PM EST
Build Host  : buildvm-x86-32.iad2.fedoraproject.org
Packager    : Fedora Project
Vendor      : Fedora Project
URL         : https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot
Bug URL     : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/foot
Summary     : Terminfo files for foot terminal
Description :
Terminfo files for foot terminal.

  4. What problem are you trying to solve with this package? Or what functionality does the package provide?

    [watson@fedora ~]$ toolbox enter
Error: terminfo entry not found for foot

  5. Can the software provided by the package be run from a container? Explain why or why not.

    Yes, I believe so. That's how I'm running it.

[watson@fedora ~]$ toolbox enter
Error: terminfo entry not found for foot

⬢[watson@toolbox watson]$ dnf search foot-terminfo
Copr repo for helix owned by varlad                                                             21 kB/s | 8.6 kB     00:00    
============================================= Name Exactly Matched: foot-terminfo =============================================
foot-terminfo.x86_64 : Terminfo files for foot terminal
⬢[watson@toolbox watson]$ sudo dnf install foot-terminfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:21 ago on Mon 20 Feb 2023 10:03:06 PM EST.
Dependencies resolved.
===============================================================================================================================
 Package                          Architecture              Version                           Repository                  Size
===============================================================================================================================
Installing:
 foot-terminfo                    x86_64                    1.13.1-2.fc38                     rawhide                     12 k

Transaction Summary
===============================================================================================================================
Install  1 Package

Total download size: 12 k
Installed size: 8.1 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
foot-terminfo-1.13.1-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm                                                          19 kB/s |  12 kB     00:00    
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                                           11 kB/s |  12 kB     00:01     
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
  Preparing        :                                                                                                       1/1 
  Installing       : foot-terminfo-1.13.1-2.fc38.x86_64                                                                    1/1 
  Verifying        : foot-terminfo-1  13.1-2.fc38.x86_64                                                                    1/1 

Installed:
  foot-terminfo-1.13.1-2.fc38.x86_64                                                                                           

Complete!
⬢[watson@toolbox watson]$ toolbox enter                 
⬢[watson@toolbox watson]$

  6. Can the tool(s) provided by the package be helpful in debugging container runtime issues?

    Yes, I think so.

  7. Can the tool(s) provided by the package be helpful in debugging networking issues?

    I don't believe so, but I'm not sure.

  8. Is it possible to layer the package locally via rpm-ostree install <package>? Explain why or why not.

    Perhaps, but again, I'm not sure. I tried this, but the results I saw were inconclusive.
tpopela commented 1 year ago

@davidthewatson this is not the right place to report this RFE as this is solely about Silverblue, but please report it in https://gitlab.com/fedora/sigs/sway/SIG/-/issues which should be the right issue tracker for Sericea.

travier commented 1 year ago

Note that there is no Fedora variant called Silverblue Sway. Silverblue comes with GNOME.

The rpm-ostree variant of Fedora that comes with Sway by default is called Sericea: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Sway_Spin

travier commented 1 year ago

Moved to https://gitlab.com/fedora/sigs/sway/SIG/-/issues/19