Closed MateusRodCosta closed 1 year ago
Can you try with only packages from Fedora?
This week, a few days ago, I am no longer able to rebase Fedora 38 precisely because of the same problem.
❯ rpm-ostree rebase fedora:fedora/38/x86_64/silverblue
2 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 788 B transferred in 2 seconds; 0 bytes content written
Checking out tree d5ab1b7... done
Enabled rpm-md repositories: fedora-cisco-openh264 fedora-modular updates-modular updates fedora rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver updates-archive
Importing rpm-md... done
rpm-md repo 'fedora-cisco-openh264' (cached); generated: 2022-10-06T10:49:41Z solvables: 4
rpm-md repo 'fedora-modular' (cached); generated: 2023-02-20T09:16:19Z solvables: 1082
rpm-md repo 'updates-modular' (cached); generated: 2018-02-20T19:18:14Z solvables: 0
rpm-md repo 'updates' (cached); generated: 2018-02-20T19:18:14Z solvables: 0
rpm-md repo 'fedora' (cached); generated: 2023-02-20T09:23:27Z solvables: 68414
rpm-md repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver' (cached); generated: 2023-02-15T21:40:23Z solvables: 30
rpm-md repo 'updates-archive' (cached); generated: 2022-11-11T05:17:33Z solvables: 0
Resolving dependencies... done
error: Could not depsolve transaction; 8 problems detected:
Problem 1: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 2: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 3: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 4: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 5: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 6: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 7: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Problem 8: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: systemd
Please try with packages from Fedora only, or try to find the package creating this conflict.
In case it's not clear: RPM Fusion is not part of Fedora.
In case it's not clear: RPM Fusion is not part of Fedora.
Hi, sorry, yeah I will try to open an issue with the RPMFusion people later today.
At least on my system it seems the Nvidia packages are 4 of the 6 packages that cause problems.
So I guess maybe there was a change in systemd packaging that RPMFusion didn't adapt to yet
Please try with packages from Fedora only, or try to find the package creating this conflict.
Oh, sorry. She hadn't paid attention. Once again, the day has been saved thanks to NVIDIA. /s
Ok, I kept my layered packages and it seems this error doesn't appear anymore.
So, likely really a conflict between RPMFusion packages and that commit at that speicfifc point (mostly Nvidia packages and a few other packages).
I will keep the bug on rpm-ostree open though, because it would be useful if it showed which packages are causing issues so it becomes easier to debug similar issues in the future.
This issue tracker is intended only for Silverblue specific issues. We would like to ask you to try to reproduce the issue on a relevant Fedora Workstation release. If you will be able to reproduce there, then please report it in Red Hat Bugzilla (see How to file a bug) or in upstream (preferred for GNOME projects) and not in this issue tracker.
Describe the bug Apparently I am unable to upgrade to 38.20230221.n.1 with my layered packages. Resetting overlays and then relayering them also gives the same error message.
The error message:
To Reproduce Please describe the steps needed to reproduce the bug:
Expected behavior Would upgrade without issues
Screenshots If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
OS version:
Additional context My rpm-ostree status: