Closed JamesBelchamber closed 1 year ago
Looks like we have't had a successful build since 38.20230624.0 for Silverblue and Kinoite and somehow rpm-ostree can not resolve the dependencies here.
I highly suspect that https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/samba/c/2d8a4bb6f8c2ca646f533cef47b4922e2c028863?branch=f38 is the culprit here and we can't do much but wait for a new compose.
@travier aren't we supposed to get an e-mail about failed composes after changes done in https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/pull-request/961 ? I personally didn't receive any.
We should but apparently this does not work yet: https://pagure.io/releng/compose-tracker/pull-request/54
Haven't had the time to investigate yet.
Thanks everyone for looking into this. Much appreciate your time and effort. I will say that I've had issues with samba updating for longer than the 24th - I feel not being able to update samba was there for awhile. In any case,
I can not reproduce the error from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7799/102587799/runroot.log locally so I don't know where the issue is.
I've asked @AdamWill to test the unified core compose again so that we can try moving to it.
@sramkrishna How long has that been an issue? The suspected change that could break overlaying samba has been introduced with https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ef663b3ec4 which landed in stable 2 days ago.
We have a new compose. Can you verify that you're able to install samba now?
This worked for me on the latest compose:
[silverblue@fedora ~]$ rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Deployments:
fedora:fedora/38/x86_64/silverblue
Version: 38.20230628.0 (2023-06-28T00:42:50Z)
BaseCommit: f3933b350390ee28c919dc4d5824682b8391a9e4deb56d767d02fcee18a3a9f9
GPGSignature: Valid signature by 6A51BBABBA3D5467B6171221809A8D7CEB10B464
Diff: 6 added
LayeredPackages: samba
● fedora:fedora/38/x86_64/silverblue
Version: 38.20230628.0 (2023-06-28T00:42:50Z)
Commit: f3933b350390ee28c919dc4d5824682b8391a9e4deb56d767d02fcee18a3a9f9
GPGSignature: Valid signature by 6A51BBABBA3D5467B6171221809A8D7CEB10B464
Thanks for addressing this so quickly. I'm not able to confirm it worked as I've moved to u-blue (I was seduced into trying it). Thanks so much for the time and effort and the fast response. Much obliged. There is a reason why silverblue is an amazing distro, thanks to people like you all. Cheers.
Installing the samba package on Silverblue 38 reports a conflicting request:
I've tested installing it in a toolbox and it works fine (except some complaints from the post-script that are probably specific to toolbox) so I suspect this is a Silverblue-specific issue.