Closed matzew closed 8 years ago
@johnfriz please review
@johnfriz any comments ?
@matzew - Are we sure we want this to be copyright Red Hat?
This will be the "FeedHenry" community repo / code. The productized version can be copyright Red Hat, but not sure if this repo should be?
Thoughts?
sure, why not? We do that on several of our OSS repos. RHT keeps the copyright, while licensing under Apache version2. Nothing speaks against that.
Examples:
but the year inclusion sucks :-)
So at AeroGear we do simply:
@johnfriz ready to merge ?
@matzew - Merge away :smile:
:shipit: :)
rht_mobile_license_header.txt
file) and replaced proprietary FH header w/ Red Hat / Apache-2NOTICE
file about used dependencies, and src includes