Closed AlbertoEAF closed 4 years ago
Merging #37 into master will decrease coverage by
0.05%
. The diff coverage is75.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #37 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 77.69% 77.63% -0.06%
Complexity 357 357
============================================
Files 39 39
Lines 1318 1319 +1
Branches 120 120
============================================
Hits 1024 1024
- Misses 228 229 +1
Partials 66 66
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | Complexity Δ | |
---|---|---|---|
...i/openml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMAlgorithms.java | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
3.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...er/lightgbm/LightGBMBinaryClassificationModel.java | 57.14% <ø> (ø) |
8.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...enml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMDescriptorUtil.java | 96.96% <ø> (ø) |
3.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...ai/openml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMException.java | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
1.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...i/openml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMMLProvider.java | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
0.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...openml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMModelCreator.java | 82.35% <ø> (ø) |
20.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...feedzai/openml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMSWIG.java | 70.96% <0.00%> (ø) |
11.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...eedzai/openml/provider/lightgbm/LightGBMUtils.java | 86.95% <ø> (ø) |
4.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...eedzai/openml/provider/lightgbm/SWIGResources.java | 73.33% <ø> (ø) |
7.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
...tgbm/LightGBMBinaryClassificationModelTrainer.java | 87.28% <100.00%> (ø) |
23.00 <0.00> (?) |
|
... and 1 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e54aa03...b56b1bc. Read the comment docs.
Ready for review even though it's not solving yet the large dataset issue (only on my computer it seems).
@ptraca @JPDSousa regarding producing a fat jar from the parent lightgbm folder, I didn't do it to avoid further complexity. The "provider" openml-lightgbm
already does it at the end, packaging lightgbmlib and the .so's with it.
To maintain the conventions of the repo, the provider artifact is openml-lightgbm
@ groupId=com.feedzai
.
The full lightgbm implementation is now a meta-module
containing lightgbm-builder and openml-lightgbm
. lightgbm-builder and the meta-module are both "hidden" at group com.feedzai.openml.lightgbm.meta
. I also moved make-lightgbm output artifact to the group above it to be together: com.feedzai.openml.lightgbm.lightgbmlib
.
Fixed :) Ping @shenggwang @JPDSousa for final review.
The build didn't pass. It failed on:
[INFO] lightgbm-builder ................................... FAILURE [01:11 min]
It seemed to me be related with the script:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:3.0.0:exec (generate-lightgbm-build) on project lightgbm-builder: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 100 (Exit value: 100) -> [Help 1]
The build didn't pass. It failed on:
[INFO] lightgbm-builder ................................... FAILURE [01:11 min]
It seemed to me be related with the script:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:3.0.0:exec (generate-lightgbm-build) on project lightgbm-builder: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 100 (Exit value: 100) -> [Help 1]
It failed to fetch things in the network in Ubuntu :sadface:
E: Failed to fetch https://esm.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/glib2.0/libglib2.0-0_2.40.2-0ubuntu1.1+esm3_amd64.deb HttpError401
E: Failed to fetch https://esm.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python-apt/python-apt-common_0.9.3.5ubuntu3+esm2_all.deb HttpError401
E: Failed to fetch https://esm.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python-apt/python3-apt_0.9.3.5ubuntu3+esm2_amd64.deb HttpError401
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
The command '/bin/sh -c apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends software-properties-common && apt-add-repository ppa:git-core/ppa && apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends apt-utils curl git jq libcurl3 libicu52 libunwind8 netcat && curl -s https://packagecloud.io/install/repositories/github/git-lfs/script.deb.sh | bash && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends git-lfs && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* && rm -rf /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* echo "UPDATED."' returned a non-zero code: 100
[ERROR] Command execution failed.
Maybe I should add this as an image to docker.hub? As in the other day it was a sourceforge downtime which made downloading SWIG fail and the build fail too. Besides, building the image takes 10minutes each time.
The build didn't pass. It failed on:
[INFO] lightgbm-builder ................................... FAILURE [01:11 min]
It seemed to me be related with the script:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:3.0.0:exec (generate-lightgbm-build) on project lightgbm-builder: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 100 (Exit value: 100) -> [Help 1]
It failed to fetch things in the network in Ubuntu :sadface:
E: Failed to fetch https://esm.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/glib2.0/libglib2.0-0_2.40.2-0ubuntu1.1+esm3_amd64.deb HttpError401 E: Failed to fetch https://esm.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python-apt/python-apt-common_0.9.3.5ubuntu3+esm2_all.deb HttpError401 E: Failed to fetch https://esm.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python-apt/python3-apt_0.9.3.5ubuntu3+esm2_amd64.deb HttpError401 E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? The command '/bin/sh -c apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends software-properties-common && apt-add-repository ppa:git-core/ppa && apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends apt-utils curl git jq libcurl3 libicu52 libunwind8 netcat && curl -s https://packagecloud.io/install/repositories/github/git-lfs/script.deb.sh | bash && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends git-lfs && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* && rm -rf /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* echo "UPDATED."' returned a non-zero code: 100 [ERROR] Command execution failed.
Maybe I should add this as an image to docker.hub? As in the other day it was a sourceforge downtime which made downloading SWIG fail and the build fail too. Besides, building the image takes 10minutes each time.
Is that a problem in terms of licensing? If not that might be a good improvement. However, let's do it in a separate PR