*** Please provide a description of the enhancement you are requesting.
The name 'message' used for one of the core procedures in MUtilsLib is too
vague.
It also clashes unnecessarily with the local variable name 'message' which is
used throughout DMSL.
I really recommend this be fixed for clarity and to avoid potentially
difficult-to-debug bugs due to name clashes (especially if they interact with
some compiler errors).
I would suggest something like 'MUtils_writeMessage', or at least
'writeMessage', or something more specific along these lines..
cheers,
d
Original issue reported on code.google.com by dmitri.k...@gmail.com on 17 Jul 2011 at 10:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dmitri.k...@gmail.com
on 17 Jul 2011 at 10:03