Closed bagustris closed 7 months ago
yes, makes sense, i used to work with the imbalance learn package some years ago i wanted to wait until my pal Uwe releases his stratification package, but that might take too long, so we could go ahead with imbalanced-learn
I guess that would be a special filter to be set in experiment class as a post-processing step to feature extraction
for shortness I'd prefer
[DATA]
balancing = ros # options: ros, smote, adasyn
Done with version 0.70.0 i changed it to [FEATS] balancing = ros # options: ros, smote, adasyn
because it's really the feature sets that are varied
Data balancing is important for machine learning.
I would to propose the following feature:
There is currently imbalanced-learn package that is contrib package of scikit-learn. However, no need to stick in this package (can be defined in
balancing_strategy
above).