Closed dominikh closed 1 year ago
Thanks for reporting this 🙇♂️. I started working on improving this code the other day and will take this issue into account!
This should be fixed now. Additionally anonymize is now more aggressive in order to prevent any potential reversing of the obfuscation. I also added a strings
command to verify the output.
I've attached the original trace and the resultant anonymized trace. staticcheck.trace.anon.gz staticcheck.trace.gz