Closed mnieper closed 6 months ago
In Proposition 5.1.3 in the Foundations, it says
basic opens of the affine parts of $X$
where $X$ is a scheme. As the datum of an affine cover of $X$ is truncated to a mere proposition in the definition of a scheme, "basic opens of the" seems superfluous, doesn't it?
Yes, it should just be an open affine cover - I guess we could only say more for special schemes.
pushed -> closing (feel free to reopen if you disagree with what I said..).
In Proposition 5.1.3 in the Foundations, it says
where $X$ is a scheme. As the datum of an affine cover of $X$ is truncated to a mere proposition in the definition of a scheme, "basic opens of the" seems superfluous, doesn't it?