Closed duncanmmacleod closed 1 year ago
The %uid
is documented in the man page, so it is formally supported and needs to stay there.
More significantly, it isn't clear to me that showing the current default value is better than the statement of logic. I think the statement of logic is helpful and that changing help messages depending on the situation can be confusing. Is there another reason for the change that you didn't mention?
This change was just my attempt to make the argument parsing more compact, relying on less post-processing of the various options. I'm don't have strong opinions on this really, so if you decide to reject I'm happy to move on.
Ok let's skip this one.
This PR refactors the default-handling for
-o/--outfile
and--web-open-command
into functions that are called directly when callingadd_option()
, rather than after-the-fact.This has the upside that the
-h/--help
message now shows exactly what the default will be, rather than a statement of logic.@DrDaveD, one feature that I removed here, is that if the user deliberately passes a string that contains
%uid
, e.g. via-o ./bt_%uid
, that is no longer expanded. However, I have no idea if that is 'supported' formally. Happy to put that back in as requested.