fernandogdj / microblog-purple

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/microblog-purple
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

microblog-purple v 0.3.0 does not suppor Twitter API v1.1 #270

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Installed pidgin and pidgin-microblog packages from Debian wheezy repository
2. Attempted to configfure twitters account
3. Getting "authorisation error"

What is the expected output? 

successful login 

What do you see instead?

Authorisation error

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

pidgin 2.10.7
pidgin-microblog 0.3.0
libpurple 2.10.7
Please provide any additional information below.

https://dev.twitter.com/blog/api-v1-is-retired describes api v1.0 being retired 
and API v1.1 being enabled
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/embedded-timelines

Debug Log shows:

(12:58:49) util: Response headers: 'HTTP/1.1 410 Gone
content-length: 201
content-type: application/xml; charset=utf-8
date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:58:49 UTC
server: tfe
set-cookie: guest_id=v1%3A137126512917318001; Domain=.twitter.com; Path=/; 
Expires=Mon, 15-Jun-2015 02:58:49 UTC
strict-transport-security: max-age=631138519
Connection: close

'
(12:58:49) util: parsed 201
(12:58:49) mb_net: mb_conn_fetch_url_cb: url_data = 0x7f274870e200
(12:58:49) mb_net: going to call handler
(12:58:49) twitter: response = <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><errors>  
<error code="68">The Twitter REST API v1 is no longer active. Please migrate to 
API v1.1. https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api/1.1/overview.</error></errors>

Original issue reported on code.google.com by tmcio...@gmail.com on 15 Jun 2013 at 3:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Pardon for the lack of information that I'm reporting, but I'm receiving 
similar issues as well & don't want add redundant information here.

Original comment by tstod...@gmail.com on 15 Jun 2013 at 3:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
This is essentially a duplicate of 269, btw.

Original comment by ak.hep...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2013 at 2:00