Closed ferrous26 closed 10 years ago
I guess this is not getting done for kernel 4?
it can, but I'm not really sure if i agree that all tasks so should really be sitting in its own priority level as much as the medium-low-high with a few exceptions that need to sit either higher or lower off of the baseline
We have 32 levels, and less than 32 tasks. We can, and possibly should, give each task it's own priority level. We should at the least spread things out a lot more.
We can add
#define
s for these in respective server headers.term_server.h
could have:Doing this might make it easier to set priorities relative to other tasks:
It is interesting to see how fiddling with priority levels causes us to miss deadlines during boot.