SALOME meshing guide

[RemDelaporteMathurin]

Proposed changes

This is an attempt at a simple SALOME to FESTIM tutorial advancing towards #739.

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to FESTIM?

• [ ] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• [ ] Code refactoring
• [x] Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
• [ ] New tests

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 99.53%. Comparing base (fb2c99f) to head (09143db). Report is 40 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head 09143db differs from pull request most recent head 3af630d

Please upload reports for the commit 3af630d to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #776 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 99.51% 99.53% +0.01% ========================================== Files 58 59 +1 Lines 2488 2577 +89 ========================================== + Hits 2476 2565 +89 Misses 12 12 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[KulaginVladimir]

@RemDelaporteMathurin, I followed the guide. In my opinion, it's nice! However, it's a bit hard to read, since the bullet points are just stacked to screenshots, but not really a problem.

Possibly, a 3D example could be a better choice, as it's usually easier to do a simpler case based on a more complex example, rather than otherwise. What do you think?

Moreover, what does the last screenshot show? I expected a mesh representation in ParaView (similar to the mesh in SALOME from the pre-last screenshot of your guide). By default, I get this view in ParaView:

[RemDelaporteMathurin]

it's a bit hard to read, since the bullet points are just stacked to screenshots, but not really a problem.

I adapted the size of the images let me know what you think

Moreover, what does the last screenshot show? I expected a mesh representation in ParaView (similar to the mesh in SALOME from the pre-last screenshot of your guide). By default, I get this view in ParaView:

So we discussed about this on the side and it appeared that this is just from using the wrong XDMF reader in Paraview. Maybe similar to this PR we need a small Paraview tutorial or at least write somewhere which reader users should use.

[RemDelaporteMathurin]

@KulaginVladimir @jhdark I added the CAD based workflow, let me know what you think