Open rmontagne opened 10 years ago
I don't understand why use like this way.
I use this method because NFS share doesn't allow php function flock, so i copy the item that i have needed on the tmp directory. I use this solution on production server, and it works great.
With your solution i must move all my TPL on the /tmp/ dir ? And i have multiple front which use the same file, and the file architecture is the same. I can’t move the tpl off all my front to the tmp dir because if i upgrade one tpl, i must upgrade all my fronts.
Do you understand my configuration ?
Romain Supvize Envoyé avec Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
Le mardi 13 mai 2014 à 08:48, Sang rak, Choi a écrit :
You don't need to do like this. This will works as your purpose:
\Rain\Tpl::configure('tpl_dir', '/tmp');or \Rain\Tpl::configure(array( 'tpl_dir' => '/tmp', //'your_own_configs' => 'your_own_configs' ));
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/rainphp/raintpl3/pull/149#issuecomment-42922574).
This will make huge load for system for production sever. (Always compile again for all page loading! It is same as debug mode) Cannot be used for production. Find other way..
Anyway, the option name nfs
is bad name for this code.
@rmontagne Sorry, I did misunderstand. I deleted that reply and I post new reply just seconds ago.
I suggest symbolic link:
$ ln -s /data/mynfs/templates /tmp/template
\Rain\Tpl::configure('tpl_dir', '/tmp/template');
no problem, In my configuration, the template compile just one times and it store on a memcached server, but if you have another solution compliance with nfs share it's so good. I think you must try a multiple front configuration with nfs yourself.
I am using raintpl for 5+ php app servers using git repository. I think, NFS is not good as use of source files. NFS is good for unpredictable changes file system like photos by user uploading.
So when you make a change on you source code, you must git pull on all off your master ?
With a symbolic link, the php flock function return false, so the template engine doesn't compile my template ...
Sure. I have seperated directory for development in main develop server. Also it has own domain. (http://**dev**.myservice.com)
I make shell script for deployment. Also there are many deployment tools for deployment like Phing.
So you must connect on each your front to launch your script or add your ssh key on your deployment server to run this script, i think i keep my solution because it more simple, I just upgrade nfs files and all my front are updated.
Thanks for your help.
Yes, this is so uncomfortable.
So i found my own way for convenience,
For development, I just always upload files to linked sftp in my IDE. (this maybe same as you) Then test many times in my development site.
And I will commit If I am sure about all changes of sources. And then, run deployment script to pull sources. I usually deploy about 4~10 times in a day.
And if you have a problem, you have a script for rollback on all of your front servers ? I think both solutions works great.
No have for rollback, just rollback source using git, then commit again. then deploy.
But my way is so slow for emergency situation.
ok, i understand you configuration, but now for me it must simple to use NFS, the template are generate and store an memcached server, and the performance isn't impact. But for the future, I will think to a deployement system like yours.
Yes. That is good with memcached or other caching system.
I suggest redis for caching system
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Sang rak, Choi notifications@github.comwrote:
Yes. That is good with memcached or other caching system.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/rainphp/raintpl3/pull/149#issuecomment-42926870 .
Sitthykun LY a little developer in the big world \o/ mobile: +85595 7788 39 skype: cityx9 twitter: sitthykun http://twitter.com/sitthykun site: niyum.com
Why not, I never tried this system.
It is monster cached system and super fast, it generate key by nanosecond I think you will fall in love. I am thinking like your moment above for this
here http://redis.io/topics/quickstart
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, rmontagne notifications@github.com wrote:
Why not, I never tried this system.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/rainphp/raintpl3/pull/149#issuecomment-42927511 .
Sitthykun LY a little developer in the big world \o/ mobile: +85595 7788 39 skype: cityx9 twitter: sitthykun http://twitter.com/sitthykun site: niyum.com
Thanks , I use this lib to manage my cache : http://maximebf.github.io/CacheCache/ and it compliance with redis, good news for me, when i have time i try to setup a redis server inside of my memcached server, have you a benchmark between both system ?
I had been use apc/redis/memcached. APC -> Memcached > Redis -> Redis + Back to APC
Memcached / Redis use much system resource. (Socket I/O) I am just using Redis for shared cached data. Others used in APC.
Here is benchmark of this comparison, sorry I forgot the live comparison
http://anton.logvinenko.name/en/blog/redis-vs-memcache-vs-memcached.html
My experience I used to develop LiveChat with memcached then I got suffer. I desired to use redis due to redis has monitoring. it's fast; can export data, log and data accuracy.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Sang rak, Choi notifications@github.comwrote:
I had been use apc/redis/memcached. APC -> Memcached > Redis -> Redis + Back to APC
Memcached / Redis has many system resource. (Socket I/O) I am using Redis for shared cached data. Others used in APC.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/rainphp/raintpl3/pull/149#issuecomment-42935069 .
Sitthykun LY a little developer in the big world \o/ mobile: +85595 7788 39 skype: cityx9 twitter: sitthykun http://twitter.com/sitthykun site: niyum.com
Hello,
I add a patch to make compatibility of raintpl3 with NFS.
Thanks.