Closed lucidrains closed 10 months ago
Hi Phil, thanks for your interest!
For 1D indexing one can simply leave out the coordinate axis in the indices expression, so this should work:
get_at("b t [d], b t -> b t", prob, indices)
or even
get_at("... [d], ... -> ...", prob, indices)
Although when testing this I found a bug that probably caused the same error you are also seeing. It should be fixed with https://github.com/fferflo/einx/commit/4273732b401a00f02dceedd80b65d5bb485eded0. Can you check if this works for you?
@fferflo lightspeed response! it works! thank you Florian; dinner or beer is on me if you are ever in SF 😃
Thanks, glad it works and I'll keep it in mind for my next (first) trip to SF 😄
hello Florian, and thank you for working on this project!
i've been testing out
get_at
and it is working like a charm! will probably start using it more and more just for this function alonewanted to consult you about a special case that I thought einx should be able to handle, but errors out on. it could be due to my not knowing how to write the right expression
the piece of code i'm trying to replace is this with something like
get_at('b t [d], b (t [1]) -> b (t [1])', prob, indices)
. this is a pattern that is recurring throughout a bunch of works, so would be nice if there were aneinx.get_at
one-liner!