[Voting] Clear verbiage is needed around rules/changes/voting

[fffrontoffice]

These rules require a 75% majority vote (8 of 12 owners) to pass amendments. There is nothing that states a 75% majority is required for votes on how to enact a rule, how a rule change retroactively impacts things, how to run votes related to preference (e.g. hold draft in Jamaica or Barbados?). Also, when owner(s) would benefit or suffer from the outcome of a vote, should their vote also be counted?

Proposal:

• A majority vote (7 of 12 for a 2 choice vote, 5 of 12 for a 3 choice vote, etc.) is sufficient to handle general voting, anything not related to rule amendments.
• When there is a tie and an impasse is reached where all votes are firm, the league must side with no change or no action. If both options require action/change, flip a coin.
• All owners votes count, whether or not they are biased or serve to benefit from a vote or not.

[fffrontoffice]

Proposal passed as worded.