Fix regression with asyncio and threading

[fgmacedo]

Based on the work on https://github.com/fgmacedo/python-statemachine/pull/444

Thanks @jsbueno for the huge help here!

Closes: https://github.com/fgmacedo/python-statemachine/issues/443

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d3ff328) to head (19365aa). Report is 36 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #445 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 20 20 Lines 1232 1236 +4 Branches 179 180 +1 ========================================= + Hits 1232 1236 +4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fgmacedo/python-statemachine/pull/445/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Fernando+Macedo) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fgmacedo/python-statemachine/pull/445/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Fernando+Macedo) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Fernando+Macedo#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud