Fix GitHub actions

[michael-kuhlmann]

GitHub actions currently do not pass because pb_bss cannot be successfully installed due to an old version of setuptools that is used. This pull request fixes this and upgrades the action versions of checkout and setup-python.

[michael-kuhlmann]

If you do not like to have the contrib commits in this PR, I can first merge the contrib changes and then create a new clean PR for this issue.

[boeddeker]

If you do not like to have the contrib commits in this PR, I can first merge the contrib changes and then create a new clean PR for this issue.

We can use one PR to merge both. It is unlikely, that we have second PR, that should be merged before your praat-textgrids code.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (2a4c391) 77.12% compared to head (dc9f016) 77.12%.

:exclamation: Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #147 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 77.12% 77.12% ======================================= Files 46 46 Lines 3729 3734 +5 ======================================= + Hits 2876 2880 +4 - Misses 853 854 +1 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fgnt/padertorch/pull/147?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [padertorch/modules/dual\_path\_rnn.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fgnt/padertorch/pull/147?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-cGFkZXJ0b3JjaC9tb2R1bGVzL2R1YWxfcGF0aF9ybm4ucHk=) | `68.34% <ø> (ø)` | | | [padertorch/configurable.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fgnt/padertorch/pull/147?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-cGFkZXJ0b3JjaC9jb25maWd1cmFibGUucHk=) | `79.82% <100.00%> (+0.03%)` | :arrow_up: | ... and [4 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fgnt/padertorch/pull/147/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None)

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[michael-kuhlmann]

I have added python 3.9 and 3.10 and adapted two doctests to work with the latest versions of torch and python:

• _ChunkRNN: According to @thequilo, LSTMs in the latest torch version (tested with torch 2.0.1) behave non-deterministically when using packed vs. non-packed input. He suggested to fix the doctest by replacing the test for strict equality with an allclose test. I increased the atol argument to 1e-6 as the max observed absolute difference between the outputs was around 6e-7
• dataclass_to_config: Python 3.10 introduced the new kw_only attribute for dataclasses which appears in the expected error message for Python 3.10 but not for Python<=3.9. Since we are only testing for the occurrence of the RunTimeError, I have added an ellipsis where the kw_only attribute would appear.

[boeddeker]

LGTM. The azure tests can be ignored, they got somehow canceled.